Part of the judgement read…

“…nondisclosure should not continue and thwart the plaintiffs’ legitimate right to redress. This court finds the weight of the plaintiffs’ current claims is more than sufficient to warrant the disclosure of the anonymous client’s identity.

The report lacks veracity and the plaintiff is entitled to all relevant discovery necessary. This court further finds that pursuit of the truth of the parties assertions is necessary here and disclosure of the client’s identity is ordered. The identity of the client is clearly necessary to enable the plaintiff to fully address its legal claims.”