Thanks for the table LD
I wish I had looked more for his calculations.
So how widespread is this variation I wonder ?
Printable View
Thanks for the table LD
I wish I had looked more for his calculations.
So how widespread is this variation I wonder ?
Apparently it's getting pretty popular in land based casinos (Asian) so I guess live games suppliers are jumping on board.
Versions I'm aware of are:
- The Opus Gaming (M88) version in this thread
- EntwineTech's recently released version (called Super 6 Baccarat)
- Bodog88's version which has been around for a while, also called Super 6 Baccarat and includes a side bet on Banker 6 win (pays 12:1)
summary here
I'll be sticking with traditional baccarat then.
hope you are satisfied with answer KanjaQuote:
Originally Posted by kanja
Dragon - Tiger (Player's first card, Banker's first card) can not be considered as "zero commision" ? What happens when "Tie" ? If "Push", then it's very good. Cause both hands pay 1:1.
Dragon Tiger should be treated as another game.
Unlike this thread concerning so called "Zero/No Commission Baccarat". Whereby the payout is altered for a banker win on 6.
Hence the discussion and some heavy maths concerning which is the better returning version of baccarat.
No heavy maths is required for Dragon-Tiger ..phew!
Zero/No commission baccarat is now available at Playtech.