Full Tilt Poker or Full Tilt Ponzi?

According to the US Justice Department it’s the latter.

They’ve now filed a revised lawsuit against operators of Full Tilt alleging the company misused money from player accounts to fund board member payments, despite assurances those accounts were protected and wouldn’t be touched.

Preet Bharara from the U.S. Attorney’s office said in a press statement:

“Full Tilt was not a legitimate poker company, but a global Ponzi scheme. Not only did the firm orchestrate a massive fraud against the U.S. banking system, as previously alleged, Full Tilt also cheated and abused its own players to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.”

Over a four year period more than $400 million was taken from player accounts to fund massive payments to board members including $41 million to Raymond Bitar, $42 million to Howard Lederer and $25 million of a promised $87.5 million to Christopher Ferguson.  As result, when the music stopped for Full Tilt back in April and the Feds shut down their sites, they owed players $390 million but only had $60 million left in player accounts from which to pay out.

Ouch!

If the allegations are true, Messrs Bitar, Lederer, Ferguson and the rest of the company’s board are NOT going to be very popular with the many thousands of poker players who are still out of pocket. I daresay they’ll want to join payment processing whiz kid turned Supergrass Daniel Tzvetkoff in hiding somewhere.

Until now the Feds have been the target of a good deal of player frustration in the belief that they were in some way impeding the payout process.

 

 

1 reply
  1. LD
    LD says:

    FullTilt lawyer Jeff Ifrah has responded in defense of the above allegations… and it’s not exactly an emphatic denial of wrongdoing.

    From an article today at ABC News…

    “Banks fail for not having sufficient revenue to cover customer deposits all the time. No one refers to such failures as Ponzi schemes. And there was no Ponzi scheme here”

    and

    ‘Ifrah conceded that Full Tilt may have been mismanaged, and the company “may have made poor decisions.” ‘

    Hmmmm, when the slick talking, high priced defense attorney is conceding wrongdoing and simply debating the flavour of the wrongdoing…you start to expect the worst!

    more at http://abcnews.go.com/Business/full-tilt-poker-defends-company-ponzi-scheme/story?id=14583408

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Sorry....we have to ask *